|
|
|
Lennart Sorth
Administrator
YaBB God
Posts: 832
WWW
|
|
« Reply #3 on: April 05, 2004, 10:29:44 pm » |
|
not very similar.
In general, only the concept is the same, - almost all parts are different. - Keep in mind that there are almost 10 years between the design of the two cars.
Regarding the suspension, the Bag. has (ex Simca 1100) torsionbar suspension at the rear, where the Murena has trailing arms , with coil springs, - in other words very different.
Also, since the Murena chassis was warm-galvanized, it is in general much easier to get these things apart, compared to a corroded Bagheera sample.
(Of course, fully maintained Bagheeras are as easy as maintained Murenas, but fully maintained Bagheeras are hard to find)
|
|
« Last Edit: April 14, 2004, 11:25:27 pm by Lennart »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spyros
Sr. Member
Posts: 325
I'm a real donkey!
WWW
|
|
« Reply #6 on: April 16, 2004, 11:43:32 am » |
|
Yes Lennart, Even if the rear Bagheera suspension was much better than the Murena, unstucking it is a nightmare Some details, If the Bagheera is a 1979 or 1980 model, there should be a nut on the external rotation point of the rear arm. Please undo this also before trying to change the setup. For the other model, Matra suggested to drill a hole on the little flat surface and to put a grease point over there. (I'll come back with the drilling height) Do it on both side of the arm. Pay attention not to switch the torsion bars or to put a wrong model (3 different sets).
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|